<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: StudioTax 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/</link>
	<description>Where personal finance &#38; frugal living are sexy, delicious, and fun.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-30957</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/#comment-30957</guid>
		<description>I installed Studio for the first time this year.. when I hit the wizard the page freezes on me and I have to hit ctrl alt delete.. and tell task manager to close the program.. What am I doing wrong.. What am I doing wrong.. and I entered some info not using the wizard, then went to Provincial ( I am in QC tried to enter a releve 1 could not enter amt.. not sure about this program or is it me. .I always have used quick tax..  I did download the Microsoft .NET Framework Version 2.0  BUT I did it after downloading   Studio tax..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed Studio for the first time this year.. when I hit the wizard the page freezes on me and I have to hit ctrl alt delete.. and tell task manager to close the program.. What am I doing wrong.. What am I doing wrong.. and I entered some info not using the wizard, then went to Provincial ( I am in QC tried to enter a releve 1 could not enter amt.. not sure about this program or is it me. .I always have used quick tax..  I did download the Microsoft .NET Framework Version 2.0  BUT I did it after downloading   Studio tax..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahendra</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-12370</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/#comment-12370</guid>
		<description>I used Studio Tax. Only one suggestion:
There must total return used summary to check while enretng new return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used Studio Tax. Only one suggestion:<br />
There must total return used summary to check while enretng new return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gardner Monk</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-12340</link>
		<dc:creator>Gardner Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/#comment-12340</guid>
		<description>It does everything I did with previous versions of paid-for software.

Just don&#039;t know why the gov&#039;t doesn&#039;t put out its own free version???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does everything I did with previous versions of paid-for software.</p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t know why the gov&#8217;t doesn&#8217;t put out its own free version???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Well done review, fox...

+Pros:
+ FREE and no SPAM advertising afterward.
+ Update feature, so it&#039;s current.
+ Easy to install from either the .exe or .zip download.
+ Very easy to use and highly trusted. I always send a contribution ($15,00 or more for two returns) as it helps to calculate a higher refund than when I do it manually on paper. + Acccurate. I have used Studio Tax to NetFile my 2005 &amp; 2006 returns with no questions asked by CRA.
+ I like the linked-to-spouse feature.
+ Double-clicking on a calculated amount box on a form shows where the calculation came from.
+ It gets better every year.

Cons:
- CRA (Canada Revenue Agency) must have your CURRENT address on file as submitted on your T1 General; IE: a change of address must be reported to CRA before NetFiling.
- RRSP-splitting calculation is not automatic for best refund, but it handled my manual overrides well, displaying the changes in refunds for both partners almost immediately in the left &quot;Summary&quot; window.
- Not all CRA forms are available from the &quot;Forms&quot; tab.

Comments: Studio Tax handles none-complex returns very well; it does more than I would expect for FREE software. You really don&#039;t have to make a contribution, but I&#039;d recommend it if it gives you a better refund. Flexible: If you don&#039;t have all your tax forms when you first use the &quot;Wizard&quot;, just use the &quot;Wizard&quot; again at any timt to add them; all previous input is retained. I had to mail my 2007 return due to my change of address not being on file with CRA and simply used the &quot;Print&quot; tab to print off the 15 pages (double-sided printing) for mailing. I&#039;m very happy with Studio Tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done review, fox&#8230;</p>
<p>+Pros:<br />
+ FREE and no SPAM advertising afterward.<br />
+ Update feature, so it&#8217;s current.<br />
+ Easy to install from either the .exe or .zip download.<br />
+ Very easy to use and highly trusted. I always send a contribution ($15,00 or more for two returns) as it helps to calculate a higher refund than when I do it manually on paper. + Acccurate. I have used Studio Tax to NetFile my 2005 &amp; 2006 returns with no questions asked by CRA.<br />
+ I like the linked-to-spouse feature.<br />
+ Double-clicking on a calculated amount box on a form shows where the calculation came from.<br />
+ It gets better every year.</p>
<p>Cons:<br />
- CRA (Canada Revenue Agency) must have your CURRENT address on file as submitted on your T1 General; IE: a change of address must be reported to CRA before NetFiling.<br />
- RRSP-splitting calculation is not automatic for best refund, but it handled my manual overrides well, displaying the changes in refunds for both partners almost immediately in the left &#8220;Summary&#8221; window.<br />
- Not all CRA forms are available from the &#8220;Forms&#8221; tab.</p>
<p>Comments: Studio Tax handles none-complex returns very well; it does more than I would expect for FREE software. You really don&#8217;t have to make a contribution, but I&#8217;d recommend it if it gives you a better refund. Flexible: If you don&#8217;t have all your tax forms when you first use the &#8220;Wizard&#8221;, just use the &#8220;Wizard&#8221; again at any timt to add them; all previous input is retained. I had to mail my 2007 return due to my change of address not being on file with CRA and simply used the &#8220;Print&#8221; tab to print off the 15 pages (double-sided printing) for mailing. I&#8217;m very happy with Studio Tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Great review. I used (and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.garamchai.com/canada/CanadaArticle5.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;reviewed&lt;/a&gt;)
StudioTax’07 and would certainly recommend it to individuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review. I used (and <a href="http://www.garamchai.com/canada/CanadaArticle5.htm" rel="nofollow">reviewed</a>)<br />
StudioTax’07 and would certainly recommend it to individuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fox</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the update Barry! :)
I&#039;m still waiting for some T-forms, so I still have to wait before filing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the update Barry! <img src='http://www.squawkfox.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I&#8217;m still waiting for some T-forms, so I still have to wait before filing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Appears to be certified now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appears to be certified now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/27/review-studiotax-2007/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I had a feeling it might not handle you med expense calc.  I suggest you write the guy who makes the program.  I have asked him on occasion to add a few things or change things to ensure folks don&#039;t make mistakes and was amazed when it was in his next release.  Best give him your excel sheet so he can see your calc or explain how you calc it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a feeling it might not handle you med expense calc.  I suggest you write the guy who makes the program.  I have asked him on occasion to add a few things or change things to ensure folks don&#8217;t make mistakes and was amazed when it was in his next release.  Best give him your excel sheet so he can see your calc or explain how you calc it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

