<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Returning UFile 2007 &#8211; Trying StudioTax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/16/returning-ufile-2007-trying-studiotax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/16/returning-ufile-2007-trying-studiotax/</link>
	<description>Where personal finance &#38; frugal living are sexy, delicious, and fun.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:39:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/16/returning-ufile-2007-trying-studiotax/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/16/returning-ufile-2007-trying-studiotax/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>You guys should also try AceTax.  They are priced much lower than the other guys and worked better than the big guys.  Starts only at $6.99.
&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fredsoft.ca/acetax&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.fredsoft.ca/acetax&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys should also try AceTax.  They are priced much lower than the other guys and worked better than the big guys.  Starts only at $6.99.<br />
<b><a href="http://www.fredsoft.ca/acetax" rel="nofollow">http://www.fredsoft.ca/acetax</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fox</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/16/returning-ufile-2007-trying-studiotax/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/16/returning-ufile-2007-trying-studiotax/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Barry: Sorry for the delay! I have been away on a forced birthday vacation! I am working on StudioTax now. I&#039;ve actually mentioned StudioTax to a few of my friends...and they have all been very happy with it. So far so good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry: Sorry for the delay! I have been away on a forced birthday vacation! I am working on StudioTax now. I&#8217;ve actually mentioned StudioTax to a few of my friends&#8230;and they have all been very happy with it. So far so good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/16/returning-ufile-2007-trying-studiotax/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/16/returning-ufile-2007-trying-studiotax/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I am interested to hear how Studiotax did in relation to med expense calculations.

I suspect it will not do much.. but it would be nice to know one way or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested to hear how Studiotax did in relation to med expense calculations.</p>
<p>I suspect it will not do much.. but it would be nice to know one way or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
