<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ING Index Funds? Huh?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/15/ing-index-funds-huh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/15/ing-index-funds-huh/</link>
	<description>Where personal finance &#38; frugal living are sexy, delicious, and fun.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:13:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: On Being &#8220;Streetwise&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/15/ing-index-funds-huh/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>On Being &#8220;Streetwise&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/15/ing-index-funds-huh/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] ING Index Funds? HUH? [squawkfox] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ING Index Funds? HUH? [squawkfox] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fox</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/15/ing-index-funds-huh/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/15/ing-index-funds-huh/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Canadian Capitalist: I am in agreement with you. ING&#039;s venture into indexing is awesome news and I too look forward to their publicity! I just wish ING came in with lower fees to give TD a little competition. I can&#039;t help but look to the States and see how little they pay for index funds and ETFs and wish we had some lower fee love on this side of the border. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian Capitalist: I am in agreement with you. ING&#8217;s venture into indexing is awesome news and I too look forward to their publicity! I just wish ING came in with lower fees to give TD a little competition. I can&#8217;t help but look to the States and see how little they pay for index funds and ETFs and wish we had some lower fee love on this side of the border. <img src='http://www.squawkfox.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/15/ing-index-funds-huh/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squawkfox.com/2008/01/15/ing-index-funds-huh/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link and your comment on my blog. While I am in no rush to sell my e-Series funds (which as you rightly point out cost less than half), I&#039;m excited that a major player is going to give lots of publicity to the importance of low costs and indexing. Yes, the fees could be lower and yes, you could do better on your own but still ING deserves a pat on the back for this move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link and your comment on my blog. While I am in no rush to sell my e-Series funds (which as you rightly point out cost less than half), I&#8217;m excited that a major player is going to give lots of publicity to the importance of low costs and indexing. Yes, the fees could be lower and yes, you could do better on your own but still ING deserves a pat on the back for this move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
